This is exactly what I thought. You were not in the slightest bit interested in the finer points of constitutional law. You were making it up for the purpose of suiting your own political ageda.

SU reform is not up for debate any more. You campaigned. The “Yes” side campaigned. The students debated. The students voted. You lost.

It’s over. I note the reforms give more students a say and it will be harder now for minorities to take control of the UGM agenda. I know this doesn’t work out well for your groups. But is your inability to accept it when you lose the debate really your only justification for the trouble you guys have caused to LSE politics?

I still can’t believe you turned up to a C&S meeting, admitted infront of everybody you made a very serious mistake that could have resulted in you being sacked from any real job (namely telling the returning officer that changing the numbering was okay when it clearly wasn’t) and then you have the cheek to say that your awful blunder should mean the referendum should be overturned. I’m sorry you messed up. I really am. But why should the returning officer get the rap and the “yes” campaign, which was supported by the voice of the students, be denied simply because of your mistakes?