School to investigate authenticity of Saif Gaddafi’s thesis

By Sachin Patel

The LSE is investigating allegations of plagiarism in the PhD thesis of Saif Gaddafi, a son of Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi and alumnus of the School, but will not engage in a “rushed exercise which jumps to a speedy conclusion”, the School’s Academic Registrar, Simeon Underwood, told the Beaver on Monday.

 

Responding to purported instances of plagiarism raised by academics at other universities, who have asked not to be identified, as well as contributors to a collaborative website, Underwood said the School is following standard procedures in its investigation.

But such protocol may be overturned if a meeting of the LSE Council, the School’s highest decision-making body, to be held Tuesday, finds such an investigation is not appropriate and practical, given “the questions raised by recent events” in the North Africa country, Underwood said.

Underwood told the Beaver the School was “duty-bound” to follow up on the number of allegations, even though, taken individually, none are particularly substantial.

“The School is not rushing to say there is unarguable evidence that merits further investigation,” Underwood said.

The Registrar told the Beaver PhD theses are not ordinarily checked using Internet-based plagiarism-detection services, such as Turnitin, unless there is prior cause for suspicion. Universities and schools often buy licenses to services, such as Turnitin, which check documents for plagiarism.

A student must be informed of the specific concerns surrounding their work, and consent to use of the programme. However, at the time of Gaddafi’s enrollment as a PhD candidate, clauses pertaining to Turnitin were not present in students’ agreements.

Underwood also said other practical considerations may hinder the School’s ability to carry out a conventional plagiarism investigation. For example, Underwood said students under investigation must be given the right to reply, which is “probably not [Gaddafi’s] priority at this minute”. Students are also expected to be present at panel hearings which can form part of the process, Underwood said.

Gaddafi completed both his master’s degree and his PhD in the School’s Department of Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method.

On Monday, the department’s head, Professor Luc Bovens, told the Beaver all standard procedures were followed during Gaddafi’s time at the LSE. He said Gaddafi took all the modules required of him, and his examinations were completed under the same conditions as other students.

Bovens also said Gaddafi’s marks were “comparable” to those of other candidates.

In fact, Bovens told the Beaver the only distinguishing characteristic of Gaddafi’s time as a PhD candidate was the presence of bodyguards in the department building when he was working with his supervisor.

Two members of the Department of Philosophy named in the thesis’s acknowledgements, Dr. Alex Voorhoeve and Professor Nancy Cartwright, declined to comment.

Professor David Held, a co-director of LSE Global Governance, who worked closely with Gaddafi during his time at the School, told the Guardian last week that Gaddafi “came to voice very serious commitments to liberal values and the human rights agenda.”

Underwood told the Beaver philosophy department records indicate a continual improvement in the quality of the drafts of Gaddafi’s thesis.

He also responded to concerns about Gaddafi’s admission to study at the LSE, saying the thirty-eight-year old was “properly qualified, had strong references, and a decent GPA from the California State University”.

Bovens sought to dissuade any questions about the authenticity of Gaddafi’s thesis.

“There are reasons why students may accidentally plagiarise,” he told the Beaver. “Psychological, cultural, and accidental – it is easy to copy large chunks of the source material into one’s notes, especially if English is not one’s first language.”

Bovens also stressed the need to protect the rights of students, and said an investigation could not “single out a particular student”.

Bovens added, however, that depending on the investigation’s findings, the philosophy department may commission a formal investigation headed by someone not previously involved with Gaddafi’s studies, which will then move to either dismiss the case, or conduct a panel hearing.

Regardless of the School’s decision, public scrutiny of Gaddafi’s thesis, entitled “The Role of Civil Society in the Democratisation of Global Governance Institutions”, is unlikely to dissipate. National newspapers, such as the Times and the Independent, as well as the BBC’s flagship current affairs programme, Newsnight, have all discussed the issue.

Moreover, additional allegations have emerged, claiming pportions of Gaddafi’s thesis were ghost-written by consultants at Monitor Group, a management consulting firm, employing former a MI6 agent who sits on the advisory board of LSE Global Governance.

Underwood said though such allegations consist of “hearsay and rumour”, the School will ask the individuals responsible for the claims for further details, and carry out investigations as necessary.

Print Friendly
About the Author

  • Guttenberg

    Who was Mr Gaddafi’s supervisor? Does anyone know?

  • Pecunia Non Olet

    Yeah, who supervised the thing? Nobody seems to know, or be willing to tell.

    More on the quality of Gaddafi’s thesis to be found the Russian Front website:

    http://russian-front.com/2011/02/27/saif-gaddady-ph-d-and-the-london-school-of-economics/

    http://russian-front.com/2011/02/28/saif-gaddafi-theres-more/

  • Pingback: London School of Economics Wrestles With Qaddafi Donation | headnews.info

  • Pingback: A London University Wrestles With a Qaddafi Gift | Il Neurone USA

  • Pingback: A London University Wrestles With a Qaddafi Gift-World Bad News : World Bad News

  • Guttenberg

    I’d really like to know who supervised the Gaddafi thesis: David Held, Lord Desai or Nancy Cartwright? And why was the thesis submitted to the “Department of Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method”? Is the latter a kind of academic rubbish bin for all kinds of theses not fit for submission to more respectable LSE departments?

  • Guttenberg

    From Gaddafi’s thesis:

    “First of all, I would like to thank those at LSE who advised me directly and gave generously of their time to assist me to clarify and refine my arguments. This includes Professors Nancy Cartwright, David Held and Alex Voorhoeve. I could not have completed this thesis without them.”
    Are these the supervisors then?

    Just found this comment by one YFletcher on the website of the Independent newspaper:
    “When Saif was doing his Master’s degree at the LSE, before embarking on his PhD, he spent a huge amount of time with Professor Nancy Cartright – sometimes lasting hours which is not normally granted for Masters’ degree students. He also invited figures at the LSE such as Rudi Fara to luxury holidays in Libya and it was at this time before Saif began his PhD that discusions of donations and special degrees at the LSE for the Libyan elite were discussed by these two characters. At this time Saif attended all lectures and was always accompanied by his so-called bodyguard, a middle-aged man who looked more like an academic than a bodyguard. I note in recent days some of the professors involved with the PhD have mentioned Saif’s excellent English, such as Lord Desai, who is closely associated with Nancy Cartright and Rudi Fara – the appearances on TV of Saif show this not to be the case, the good friend of these three LSE figures ended one press conference recently with ‘Thank you much’. Just like Germany with the zu Guttenberg PhD scandal Britain now has one too, and one the LSE has been desperately trying to contain in the last few weeks, information is beginning to come out now at last, and it would be better for the LSE to come clean. There is no way Saif’s English was good enough for him to complete a Masters degree nor a PhD at a quality British university. ”

    Is there any truth to this? Can anyone confirm these rumours?

  • Pingback: A London University Wrestles With a Qaddafi Gift | favouritenews.info

  • Yvonne Fletcher

    Held is at best exceedingly naive, while Desai is best described in the words of Oscar Wilde as a “man who knows the price of everything and the value of nothing.”

  • Clayton Burns

    [are accurate indicators of the ability to pursue gradate]

    In the above text that I have submitted, please change “gradate” to “graduate.”

    Thanks. Clayton.

  • Pingback: Monitor Group, Libya, and the intellectuals | Pop Theory

  • http://leiterreports.typepad.com/blog/2011/02/qaddafi-jrs-lse-doctoral-thesis-on-justice-and-democracy-in-the-global-system.html

    Good to know that a PhD based on plagiarized work is “for sale” at LSE. What an embarrassment for them.

  • http://www.newappsblog.com/2011/02/degrees-for-sale.html

    Degrees for sale.

    … it looks as if LSE will not suffer any reputational damage nor will the academics involved (presumably influential gate-keepers within philosophy and political theory) suffer any consequences. (It is nice to read that Fred Halliday objected to the course of events.)

    To be clear: I am not against universities accepting tainted/blood money. (Most universities will have a building or a scholarship named after terrible human beings.) But there should be a clear barrier between the academic degrees and the corrupt source. All to maintain the useful fiction that we are engaged in a noble enterprise.

  • http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/mar/03/lse-gaddafi-libyan-dictator-universities

    Pity the poor university. Told for 25 years to get into bed with big money, the London School of Economics found big money sometimes stinks. This week, as the Blairites bobbed and weaved their way out of the sleazy embrace of their friend, Gaddafi of Libya, someone forgot to tell the old school tie. The LSE thought it was helping the cause by giving Gaddafi’s son a dodgy PhD, for which it accepted a £1.5m “donation”. When the Blairites did a runner, the LSE was left looking like Bugs Moran’s gang after the St Valentine’s Day massacre.

  • http://philosophicalchasm.blogspot.com/2011/02/qadhafis-dissertation.html

    Qadhafi’s son’s dissertation was plagiarized while receiving a PhD at LSE in political science. Direct passages were just lifted out of texts.

    It’s embarrassing to philosophers since Nancy Cartwright, a philosopher of science of some renown is directly thanked by him in the committee. The liberalism section definitely deals with aspects of Anglo-American political philosophy, and the section is competent. It does not seem, however, Cartwright’s cup of tea.

    In the dissertation, he also thanks Alex Voorhoeve; this is obviously the political philosopher that directly may have had some oversight of the theory section. Note that Voorhoeve doesn’t list Qadhafi as a student.

    David Held has denied being Qadhafi’s advisor, but said he played a more intimate role. He was not his advisor, and Cartwright is a philosopher of science. As such process of elimination leaves Voorhoeve, and he does not list Qadhafi on his faculty page at LSE among the students supervised.

  • http://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/education-news/gaddafi-sons-lse-thesis-written-by-libyan-academic-2233667.html

    … Erik Ringmar, a professor in international relations at Shanghai Jiaotong University, said: “I was David Held’s colleague from 2001 until 2007. For the first two years we worked closely together as fellow members of the MSc in comparative politics.” He described an incident in late 2002, when Professor Held “insisted I accept a student to our MSc programme who was a relative of Sidney Blumenthal, a Clinton crony. Unusually, I was sent an applicant’s file not from the admissions office, as always was the case, but straight from the office of the LSE director – at that time Anthony Giddens. In the [applicant's] file was a handwritten note from ‘Sid’ to ‘Tony,’ making the case that accepting his niece to do a degree at the LSE would be a wonderful opportunity to ‘continue to deepen our trans-Atlantic ties’.”

    Professor Ringmar claimed that Professor Held telephoned him and said: “You should consider it very carefully, just read the name again. It’s Blumenthal, OK? That Blumenthal’.”

    He added: “In the end, I accepted her, although her grades were substantially lower than what we usually required. I’m not proud of this but I felt intimidated by all the pressure from Giddens, the LSE director, and from David Held. I was a mere lecturer at the time – and easily intimidated.”

    The LSE dismissed the claim as that of “a disgruntled member of staff who no longer works at LSE”…

    ???? Is that to say LSE officials call Mr Ringmar a liar?

  • More from Ringmar

    I have a friend, lets call him “Jonathan,” who is an expert on corruption. I mean, he wrote his PhD about corruption and he knows everything about the ins and outs of how businessmen, maffiosi and politicians jump into bed together. Jonathan is a serious scholar, he is smart, he works hard.

    But Jonathan works at the LSE. Now when he introduces himself to an audience: “Hi, I’m Jonathan, I’m a corruption expert, I work at the LSE,” everyone will say, “yeah, we hear LSE professors are experts in this field. Ha, ha.”

  • The dazzled world

    Corruption: One word many things.

  • Brother Leader

    Saif’s faeces to be investigated? Oh Dear! Do they think that’s the right way to contain the smell emanating from various LSE departments?

  • King of Kings

    “I gave a speech at LSE and all I got was this bloody baseball cap”

  • Pingback: Website

  • Pingback: Gaddafi’s son philosophises on war crimes | This Blog Harms

  • Pingback: mql4 generator

  • Pingback: School to investigate authenticity of Saif Gaddafi’s thesis ...

  • Pingback: Brisbane Carpet Cleaning