Complaints filed over Muhammad cartoons

by Sydney Saubestre on 24 Jan 2012 in Breaking News, Feature - Home Page, News

On 16th January the Students’ Union received an official complaint from two students at the LSE that the LSE Students’ Union Atheist, Secularist and Humanist Society (ASH) Society posted cartoons, depicting the Prophet Muhammad “having a pint,” on their society’s Facebook page.  The Students’ Union has since received “over 40 separate official complaints from the student body.” Several students within the LSE community have publicly and privately denounced the perceived proliferation of Islamophobic sentiments on campus.

On 14th January, members of the LSE’s Ash Society began posting cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad in a sign of solidarity with the Atheist Humanist Secularist group at the University College of London (UCL). The group at UCL was asked by the UCL Students’ Union to remove said cartoon of the Prophet Muhammad, used to advertise one of their events, after a Muslim student at the university complained.

Facebook posts by the LSE Students’ Union ASH Society included many cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad, as well as other satirical religious comic strips, alongside pleas to sign the “Defend freedom of expression’ petition that began at UCL. One member of the Facebook group urged other members to sign in order “to speak up against religious fascism.” In a comment on an article posted on the wall entitled “Orthodox Judaism treats women like filthy little things” one group member wrote: “a reminder that most religions, not only Islam, are misogynistic.” Members of the LSE’s Islamic community were deeply offended by this targeted campaign against “religious fascism” and the perceived rise of Islamophobic views on campus.

Nabeel Moosa, President of the the LSE Students’ Union Islamic Society asserted that “whilst we support and recognise the value of free speech, it is always absolutely necessary to distinguish between ‘free speech’ and hate speech. The actions of some members of the Atheist, Humanist and Secularist Society and others have sought to marginalise a large proportion of the LSE student body while also causing harm to the welfare of Muslim students who have been subject to a hateful campaign against their beliefs and liberties. We must also be aware that speech can very quickly turn into violence if not used responsibly.”

On 20th January, members of ASH Society met with Stanley Ellerby-English, Students’ Union Activities and Development Officer, who explained “the situation, the complaints that had been made and how the action of posting these cartoons was in breach of the Students’ Union policy on inclusion and the society’s constitution.” The society agreed to certain outcomes, though these have not been disclosed yet; however, the Students’ Union will “now be telling the society that they cannot continue these actions under the brand of the SU.”

Chris Moos, President of the LSE’s Students’ Union ASH Society, responded to the formal complaints that had been filed against the society, stating that the issue should not be framed as one pertaining to Islamophobia.

“We firmly reject the allegation that actions of our members have ‘sought to marginalise’ anyone, have caused ‘harm to the welfare of Muslim students’ or constituted a ‘targeted campaign,’” Moos said. “Although we reserve the right to criticise religious ideas, as humanists we will always oppose any targeted campaign against any community. We strongly oppose any form of anti-Muslim prejudice. The cartoons criticise religion in a satirical way. They do not target or call for the targeting of Muslims or any other religious group.  Framing the criticism of religion as ‘discrimination’ or ‘Islamophobic actions’ is highly misguided and results in the stifling of valid debates. We do not discriminate amongst religions in our criticisms.”

The Students’ Union sabbatical officers addressed the issue at the UGM held on 19th January and are currently investigating the claims. An Emergency General Meeting (EGM) is scheduled for Thursday 26 January at 1:00p with two separate motions, one on antisemitism and the other on Islamophobia, to be discussed.

“There will be two separate motions which will lay out what these types of discrimination incorporate and that the SU stands against them,” said Sherelle Davis, Anti-Rascism Officer. “The recent Anti-Semitic incident on the ski trip and the Islamophobic actions taken by certain campus groups have brought these issues to the forefront of race relations at the moment and it’s important the SU take a stance on it.”

The Students’ Union issued the following statement to further reiterate their stance on religious discrimination on campus: “the LSE community’s values of tolerance, diversity, and respect for all students regardless of race, ethnicity, gender, sexuality or religious affiliation are not in accordance with the offensive nature displayed in the recent cases of antisemitism and Islamophobia. We respect the need for freedom of expression and discussion, but believe there must be a balance between respecting freedom of speech and protecting the communities that make up the student body at the LSE.”

Related posts:

  1. Official complaints log points to scrappy election
  2. Official complaint filed over Union officials’ conduct
  3. Antisemitic drinking game leads to brawl
  4. Reforms passed amidst complaints regarding constitutional validity
  5. Referendum Complaints Log

  • Pingback: LSE Students in Freedom of Speech Battle as They Refuse to Remove Jesus and Mohammed Cartoons |

  • Muhammad

    We should make fun of Muhammad. Why? Because he’s preaching to us (and about us, as damned unbelievers).
    And at age 49, he married the 6 year old daughter of his neighbor and best friend. The marriage was not consummated until she was 9 years old, and had reached puberty.
    He’s not a pedophile – people married younger – but he’s still a pervert. Apparently, he dreamt (from Allah) that he should have her. Filthy man.

    And he was a killer, as well as a slave-owner.

    Just saying.

    Also, “The author of Jesus and Mo has stated in the past that the “Mo” in his cartoon is not Mohammed but a body double, so he is already observing the modern Islamic restriction on making images of the prophet.” (UK Guardian comment on article about this).

  • anon

    http://www.humanism.org.uk/news/view/971

    For a statement by ASH. Just to keep the balance here, as the SU is actually seemingly following a course/crusade…

  • A Hermit

    The cartoon is nothing but the expression of an honest belief that Jesus and Mohammed were just human beings like the rest of us. Doesn’t that belief deserve as much respect as the belief that they were somehow messengers of God?

    Seems to me that it’s the “unbelievers” who are being targeted, marginalized and subjected to a campaign of hatred here.

  • Pingback: Your Speech Has Been Weighed In The Balance And Found Wanting | Popehat

  • The Other Tom

    I hope LSE Students’ Union understands that they are international laughingstocks over their treatment of ASH society in this matter.

  • Sebastian

    Here’s a little tip Sydney: he’s not THE PROPHET, he’s the Islamic prophet, and *only* the Islamic Prophet. He’s not my prophet nor is he a prophet to the vast majority of people on the planet.

    Cease kowtowing to Islamic supremacists you adolescent, posturing HACK.

  • Frog

    Joan Smith’s commentary on issues related to this in The Independent is highly recommended:
    http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/joan-smith/joan-smith-strong-religious-belief-is-no-excuse-for-intimidation-6292815.html

  • Pingback: Complaints over SU society’s Muhammed cartoons | Ones to Watch

  • Pingback: A protection racket | Butterflies and Wheels

  • Chris

    Who decides what is Islamophobic?

  • Dan

    This is a disgrace, though it was mildy amusing to see our “elected” leaders stumbling over themselves to do their best Neville Chamberlain at Munich impressions.

    I am not an atheist and I have had differences with Atheists in the past. But the fact is that they are being singled out, and whats worse there is a double standard here from the infantile Muslim supremacists. There would be zero complaints if this was about Jesus or the Buddha or even Joseph Smith, but in the case of Mohamed they seem to feel they have the right to tell other people what to do and have the whole world revolve around them no matter where they are or how small of a minority they happen to be.

    You are part of the human race dudes, and you either have to live with the fact that other people share this planet or run off to somewhere where they don’t because they have all been murdered or driven out.

  • Steven Carr

    Is it racist to link to Islamic web sites?

    http://www.yanabi.com/Hadith.aspx?HadithID=129584

    Is if offensive to Muslims that non-believers do things that Muslims are forbidden to do, such as produce an image of Muhammad, drink alcohol, eat pork, or engage in homosexuality?

  • Pingback: A few thoughts on freedom of speech « Katatrepsis